Changelog — Context Locking
Frozen Baseline discipline. Material changes only.
Version 1.0
Published: 2026-06-17
- Initial structural baseline publication.
- Definition of context locking established as a mechanism that preserves, constrains, or stabilizes contextual state across information processing, communication, or decision environments.
- Scope boundaries formalized (included / excluded).
- Structural phase model introduced (context identification → context boundary → context preservation → context lock).
- Context structure model introduced (context state, context boundary, context drift, context lock).
- Foundational source architecture introduced to document the progression from meaning and interpretation to formal contextual representation.
- Sources organized as a developmental chain spanning semiotics, context formation, sensemaking, decision systems, knowledge representation, and formal semantic structures.
- Contextual stability recognized as a foundational layer preceding entity identification, information assessment, validation processes, and propagation mechanisms.
- Mandatory legal, privacy, terms, and license pages implemented.
- 2026-07-22 — Added root-level llms.txt following LLMS Baseline v2.0 to provide a canonical machine-readable orientation layer for published resources.
- 2026-09-27 — Removed the email property from Organization JSON-LD across the published site to align the implementation with the established portfolio governance baseline. Frontend contact information remains unchanged. No change to the domain’s semantic definition, scope, structural model, or existing JSON-LD architecture.
Status: Frozen Baseline
Change Policy
Changes are recorded only if:
- The definitional boundary materially evolves.
- A structural clarification alters conceptual framing.
- Primary institutional reference frameworks materially change.
- A compliance-relevant correction is required for accuracy.
Minor editorial, stylistic, or formatting corrections are not versioned.
Versioning Logic
Version increments follow semantic clarity rules:
- Major increment — Definitional or structural shift.
- Minor increment — Material clarification without conceptual shift.
- No increment — Editorial refinement only.